BVN Air USA

Fan selection guide

Inline Centrifugal vs Inline Axial Duct Fans

The correct choice depends on the required airflow, the resistance of the system and the actual operating point—not on airflow alone.

BVN duct-fan example: BDF

Inline Centrifugal

BVN BDF inline centrifugal duct fan

Air enters along the fan axis, gains energy as it is accelerated outward through the centrifugal impeller, and is then redirected into the inline discharge.

Airflow path through an inline centrifugal fan Air enters axially, turns through the centrifugal impeller, and exits in the inline direction. Axial inlet Radial energy transfer Inline discharge
The external inlet and outlet remain inline; the airflow changes direction inside the centrifugal stage.
View the BDF product family

BVN axial-construction example: SF

Axial Airflow

BVN SF axial cooling fan illustrating axial airflow construction

Air moves broadly parallel to the motor shaft. This arrangement is generally associated with high airflow where system resistance is comparatively low.

Airflow path through an axial fan Air passes through the fan broadly parallel to the shaft and duct axis. Flow remains broadly parallel to the fan axis
The diagram shows the axial airflow principle. Installation format and pressure capability still depend on the selected axial-fan model.
View the SF axial cooling-fan family

Typical Pressure–Airflow Behavior

Inline centrifugal Axial
Illustrative pressure-airflow comparison A schematic chart showing the typical tendency of centrifugal fans to maintain airflow against greater system resistance, while axial fans are commonly used for higher airflow at lower resistance. Greater resistance capability Higher-flow, lower-resistance duty Airflow Static pressure Lower Higher

Important: This is a qualitative comparison of typical fan-type behavior, not a product performance curve. Final selection must use the published curve for the exact model, speed and operating point.

Selection Comparison

Selection factorInline centrifugal fanInline axial fan
Airflow pathAxial inlet, radial acceleration through the impeller, then redirection into the inline discharge.Air remains broadly parallel to the shaft and duct axis.
System resistanceTypically better suited to duct systems with filters, dampers, fittings or longer runs.Generally best suited to short, relatively straight and low-resistance airflow paths.
Primary strengthMaintaining the required airflow as external static pressure increases.Moving a high volume of air when only limited pressure is required.
Typical applicationsDucted supply, exhaust and return-air systems; compact mechanical spaces.Low-resistance ventilation and straight-through airflow applications. Product suitability depends on the specific axial-fan construction.
How to selectCalculate the required airflow and total external static pressure, then confirm the operating point on the exact fan curve. Fan type alone is not a selection method.

Product-family clarification: BDF is an inline centrifugal duct-fan family. SF is shown only as a BVN example of axial fan construction; the SF family is classified as an axial cooling fan for applications such as condensers, chillers and air-handling equipment. It is not presented as a direct inline-duct replacement for BDF. Noise and efficiency must also be compared at the required operating point—neither fan type is automatically quieter or more efficient in every application.

The difference is where the air changes direction

Both fan types sit inside a duct run and both move air along it. What separates them is what happens to the air inside the housing.

In an axial fan, air enters and leaves along the same axis as the shaft. The blades act like a propeller: they push air forward without changing its direction. This is an efficient way to move a large volume of air when there is little resistance in the way.

In an inline centrifugal fan, air enters axially, is thrown outward by a rotating impeller, and is then redirected back into the duct. That change of direction converts rotational energy into pressure. It is a less direct path, and that is precisely the point — it is how the fan develops the pressure needed to push air through a system that resists it.

Pressure capability

This is the deciding factor in most real selections.

A duct system resists airflow. Every foot of duct, every elbow, every filter, damper, grille and termination adds resistance, and that resistance rises roughly with the square of airflow. The fan has to overcome all of it.

Axial fans produce high airflow at low pressure. Push them into a system with meaningful resistance and airflow collapses quickly. Centrifugal fans, particularly with backward-curved impellers, hold their airflow much better as pressure rises.

As a rule of thumb: short, straight, wide duct runs favour axial. Long runs, multiple fittings, filters or long vertical risers favour centrifugal.

Airflow capability

For the same physical size and power, an axial fan will generally move more air — as long as it does not have to work against pressure. This is why axial fans dominate applications like equipment cooling, condenser sections and simple through-wall ventilation.

Our BORAX inline axial series covers roughly 330 to 1,800 CFM. Our BDF inline centrifugal series covers roughly 120 to 950 CFM in duct sizes from 4 to 12 inches. The overlap in the middle of those ranges is exactly where the pressure question decides the selection.

Noise

Neither type is inherently quieter; the noise depends on where the fan is operating on its curve and how it is installed.

That said, the character of the sound differs. Axial fans tend to produce a more tonal, blade-pass noise that carries along the duct. Centrifugal fans tend to produce broader-band noise that is easier to attenuate.

The larger practical point is that a fan running far from its best efficiency point is noisy regardless of type. A centrifugal fan forced to run at very low pressure, or an axial fan struggling near stall, will both be louder than a correctly selected unit.

Efficiency and energy

Backward-curved centrifugal impellers are the more efficient choice across most of the operating range where duct systems actually live. They also have a non-overloading power characteristic, meaning motor power does not run away if the system resistance turns out lower than designed.

Axial fans are efficient in their own domain — high volume, near-zero pressure — and inefficient outside it.

Installation and service

Both types install in the duct run and both can usually be mounted in any orientation. What differs in practice is what happens later.

One point deserves care, because marketing material often states it backwards. External rotor motors are cooled by the airstream they are moving, so a restricted or blocked duct reduces motor cooling at exactly the moment the motor is working hardest. What protects the fan is not tolerance of that condition but integral thermal protection, which shuts the motor down before damage occurs. When specifying a fan that will sit above a ceiling and rarely be visited, confirm the thermal protection and plan the access rather than assuming the motor will cope.

What happens when the installed system is worse than the drawing

This is the case that decides most selections, and it is almost never published.

Suppose a system is designed at 0.4 in. wg and, once built, actually presents 0.7 in. wg. That is a routine outcome: flex duct sags, an elbow gets added to clear a beam, the roof cap turns out more restrictive than assumed.

An axial fan selected at 0.4 in. wg is already near the limit of its useful range. Pushed to 0.7, airflow does not fall gently. On many axial curves it collapses, and the fan can enter a stall region where flow becomes unstable and noisy. The system does not merely underperform, it misbehaves.

A backward-curved centrifugal fan at the same duty also loses airflow, but along a predictable slope, and it stays in a stable part of its curve. You get less air than designed, you can measure how much, and you can recover it with speed or a different selection.

Degrading predictably is worth more on a job site than a marginally better catalogue figure at the design point. The real argument for inline centrifugal in commercial work is not that it wins on paper — it is that it is still usable when the building does not match the drawing.

How to choose

Work through it in this order. First, establish the airflow you actually need. Second, calculate the total static pressure the system will impose — not the pressure you hope for. Third, look at where that operating point falls on the candidate fan curves.

If your operating point sits at low pressure with high volume, an axial fan is likely the more economical answer. If it sits at moderate to high pressure, or if the system has long runs, several elbows, a filter or a long vertical riser, select centrifugal.

If the operating point sits near the edge of what an axial fan can deliver, choose centrifugal. Systems in the field almost always have more resistance than they had on the drawing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for a long duct run, centrifugal or axial?

Centrifugal. Long runs create static pressure, and a centrifugal fan holds its airflow far better as pressure rises.

Can I use an inline axial fan for bathroom exhaust in a building?

Only if the duct run is short and straight with minimal fittings. Most multi-story or multi-unit exhaust systems have enough resistance that an inline centrifugal fan is the appropriate choice.

Is a centrifugal fan always quieter?

No. Noise depends more on how close the fan is to its best efficiency point and on the installation than on the fan type.

What is a backward-curved impeller?

An impeller whose blades curve away from the direction of rotation. It gives higher efficiency and a non-overloading power curve compared with forward-curved designs.

Follow Us on LinkedIn